Agency, Structure, and the Myth of the Immaculate Perception

Picture 7

National Public Radio on the weekend played a story (an interview with Neal Gabler, the author of an Atlantic article on the same topic) about how hard many in the US have it economically. Continue reading

Writing Well: An Incomplete Set of Guidelines


It’s that time of the semester: final essays. But before you mash the
print button or send that paper to your professor, you should take a
quick look at this writing advice from Prof. Matthew Bagger. Prof.
Bagger gave these tips to his REL 360 course but they are helpful for any papers you may have coming due this semester.

“If there’s anything [God] hates, it is… oozy writing.”

–William James (1905)

A good persuasive essay presents a cogent and compelling argument with clarity, elegance, and verve.  The following guidelines should help you craft an effective essay.

Continue reading

“A Horse is a Horse, of Course of Course”


In a review essay posted recently at the Boston Review — entitled “Holy Wars: Secularism and the Invention of Religion” — James Chappel looked at several recent books on religion and modernity. In that article he wrote as follows: Continue reading

Inaugural Department Chairs Workshop

Picture 10

For several years the American Academy of Religion has been the home for a group of public university department chairs, meeting annually to discuss shared challenges. But the 90 minute lunch meeting (such as last November’s) just isn’t enough time to discuss anything in any real detail.
Picture 11

Continue reading

The “News” Askew

The News Askew Blog Image

Image from Creative Commons: Public Domain

The following is cross-posted from RELephantUA, the class blog for the REL Captsone Seminar. Be sure to check their blog for more great posts studying religion in culture.

By Chris Beacham

Yesterday afternoon, a swarm of protesters marched to the steps of the United States capitol to protest the undue influence of money in politics and corporate lobbying. The group peacefully approached the capitol building, and many were quickly arrested, including a journalist for the popular show “The Young Turks”. There were many reactions on social media, some considering that this could be the beginning of the next “Occupy Wall Street” movement. The revolution that Bernie Sanders has encouraged during his campaign seemed to be percolating. No matter what your politics are, in the United States, it was the most interesting story of the day.

The media did not cover it. Not even a little. I was checking the major news stations as it was happening, and there was no coverage or mention of what was happening. It reaffirmed something to me that has unfortunately been on display throughout the 2016 election: the media is selecting and neglecting, and thus, creating its own narrative. The narratives delivered by each news outlet are constructed for ideological or entertainment purposes. There is a strong argument to be made that unbiased, information-driven news no longer exists.

MSNBC and Fox News are both partisan, and on opposite sides of the political spectrum. This is common knowledge. If my politics are more liberal, there is a good chance I will seek out MSNBC to reaffirm my positions and have my “information” filtered through that ideological perspective. The same goes for Fox News if I am more conservative. For both of those situations, you are selecting a narrative more than selecting an outlet for information.

The irony is that, CNN, the major 24/7 news network that I believe attempts to be politically neutral, is the most problematic. For the past year, CNN has neglected nearly everything else happening in the world and in this country to mostly alternate coverage between Trump, the election, and ISIS. In other words, fear, drama, and more fear. There are few exceptions to this pattern.

Obama gave an interview in Chicago this past week on his Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, and the conflict on constitutionality between him and the Republican congress.  It was an important interview being held at the university where the President previously taught constitutional law. CNN showed the President walking onto the stage, acknowledged this was taking place, and then cut back to talking heads arguing about Trump.

Other news media outlets have excessively covered the election and Trump as well, but they still seem to have retained a balance between election coverage and other significant news that happens every day. However, CNN’s narrative is that the 2016 election is the most important thing taking place in the world right now, and that the center of international concern is a twitter argument between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. CNN is also selecting the most dramatic stories (sometimes repeatedly for weeks), sensationalizing them, and then bringing people on the program to argue with each other for our entertainment. It is not educating, enlightening, or even communicating important information, more than it is creating a worldview and perpetuating it throughout the day.

Recognizing how a narrative is being built is an important facet of learning to deconstruct. Through deconstruction, we take nothing on face value, and contemplate why and how things are being represented. If I were to listen to CNN, I could assume ISIS is close to world domination, the global concern is over what Donald Trump said this week, and Bernie Sanders is too on the fringe to get the democratic nomination. The “news” is not not information, but narratives, and these narratives need to be constantly challenged.

A Tired Old Joke

 New Girl cece and mom

The following is cross-posted from RELephantUA, the class blog for the REL Captsone Seminar. Be sure to check their blog for more great posts studying religion in culture.

By Liz Long

In TV, the same jokes have a habit of popping up over and over again in different shows. Someone falls in love with their work partner. Someone has two dates to the same event. Everyone’s family is dysfunctional. They’re tiring, boring plots that we’ve seen several times before on several different shows.

New Girl recently employed what I find to be the most frustrating and un-funny recurring joke: white guy picks up the wrong non-white woman.

liz blog

Nick picks up the wrong South Asian woman on Fox’s New Girl.

In the season 5 premiere, Nick is tasked with picking up Cece’s mom from the airport. But-shocker!-he picks up the wrong person. Fans of the show will recall that this should not be the first time Nick has met Cece’s mom-ostensibly, he met her at Cece’s wedding in season 2. Despite this, and despite the fact that Cece’s mom speaks perfect English (and the woman he picks up doesn’t speak English at all), Nick manages to basically kidnap another South Asian woman and take her to Cece’s engagement party.

As I’ve said before, this is hardly the first time this joke has been employed. The other scene that sticks out most to me is from Arrested Development, when Michael thinks he’s giving Lupe (also a woman he’s met several times before) a ride to work, but actually picks up a different Latina woman.

Arrested Development Liz Blog Post

Michael picks up a woman who is not actually his mother’s housekeeper on Arrested Development.

Why do we see this joke over and over again? And why are the men in these shows able to completely ignore the fact that the woman in their car is terrified of them?

Racial minorities are frequently made the butt of jokes on television. This joke is yet another example of it. The minority character’s pain is translated into a joke, rather than taken seriously (much like we see in reality!).

New Girl seems to have somewhat of an issue with its portrayal of immigrants. Tran, Nick’s silent, old, Southeast Asian friend, is a perfect example of Jane Iwamura’s “Oriental Monk” trope (a topic which I have blogged about in the past). This is somewhat surprising, given the show’s complex and well-rounded portrayals of several other minority characters (particularly Winston and Coach, two black men, and Cece, an Indian woman). These characters, however, are natural-born citizens. Often, the show uses humor to address the stereotypes assigned to these characters. For instance, in season 2, Winston reminds Schmidt that he is black, regardless of whether or not he fits into stereotypes about black men. Given the show’s history with characters of color, it is possible that this joke is intended as social commentary on the idea that all South Asian/Latino/insert-minority-group-here people look the same. However, in the context of the episode and the show as a whole, it doesn’t appear that this is so. In previous episodes, social commentary was clearly made. By the end of the episode, the joke is flipped back onto the non-minority character. In a sense, it is the non-minority character’s insensitive actions which become the joke, rather than the minority character. In this instance, the joke reversal doesn’t really happen. Nick realizes that he’s picked up the wrong woman, but that’s about all that happens. We never see an apology from Nick to this woman.

To me, this joke represents a trend seen too often in reality. We as Americans fail to listen to minority voices. We don’t even ask for their names. We laugh at our mistakes, but don’t do anything to correct them. But as long as jokes like these remain pervasive in the media, the problem won’t go away. Our treatment of minorities will continue to just be a funny joke.

Another Successful Honors Day


Last Friday, April 8th, was Honors Day here at the University. It’s a day when classes are dismissed so that departments can recognize and celebrate their students. In typical fashion, REL hosted an Honors Day banquet, back here on the balconies of Manly for the first time in a couple years. Profs, parents, and students gathered together to celebrate the student’s achievements while chowing down on some delicious catfish of course. Continue reading

Back to the Basics


We’ve been working for some time, here in REL, to shift attention from the data to the skills — did you ever notice how our Department logo steers clear of a kaleidoscope of world religions symbols and, instead, focuses firmly on the place where we do our work?

Alabama logo

That wasn’t an accident. Continue reading