
Studying
Religion in
Culture
|
|
|

|
Hot off the Presses!
REL faculty members are a pretty productive group of people;
apart from keeping your eyes peeled for a forthcoming book
from Prof. Ramey,
forthcoming peer review essays from Prof. Marouan,
and Prof. Jacobs's
forthcoming book (pictured at right), as well as a just-published
edited volume from Prof. Trost,
the following three books have just been published.
|
 |
| |
|
Representing
Religion: Essays in History, Theory, and Crisis, by
Tim Murphy
Since Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) argued that there
is an arbitrary, not a natural, relationship between a signifier
and what it signifies, the human sciences have been in a "crisis
of representation." This volume consists of essays which
explore the critical and constructive dimensions of that crisis.
The critical dimension focuses on the history of Religious
Studies, especially Phenomenology, showing how it has been
predicated on a transcendental, non-empirical concept of subjectivity
(German: Geist). This led to a universalized concept
of “consciousness” and a dehistoricized concept of "experience"
as central to the understanding of religion. Freidrich Nietzsche's
critique of precisely these concepts, as refined and extended
by poststructuralist theorists, is applied to this segment
of the history of the study of religion. The constructive
dimension of this work combines the methodological insights
of Nietzsche and Saussure, along with Michel Foucault, Roland
Barthes, and Mikhail Bakhtin to form a "Nietzschean semiotics"
which serves as the basis for a new theory of religion. This
theory sees religion as the agonistic deployment of semiotic
materials both to structure difference and to form trans-generational
identities.
|
|
Introducing
Religion: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Z. Smith, edited
by Willi
Braun and Russell
McCutcheon
To mark the contribution of one of the most influential theorists
of religion, some of the leading scholars of religion from
around the world have put their minds together to work on
problems of introducing "religion" as a category
of human social practices, as a term that must be subject
to scholarly theorizing, as a subject that must be carefully
presented to students in the classroom. The claim of this
volume is that the disciplined, cross-cultural and comparative
study and teaching of religion in the academy is closely tied
to the multi-level task of "introducing" (in the
Latin sense of introducere, to bring a new, possible
alien element in from the outside) religion, of taking religion
inside the academic discourses in the humanities and social
sciences, of taking students--whether career academics or
college students--inside religion as a set of ordinary human
practices rather than initiating them into a sanctum of extraordinary
knowledge about extraordinary things.
|
|
Studying
Religion: An Introduction, by Russell
McCutcheon
While many entry level resources concentrate on providing
detailed descriptions of the world's religions, Studying
Religion: An Introduction turns its attention from the
data of religion to the analytic skills required of anyone
interested in studying the behaviors and institutions that
we commonly name as religions. It therefore shifts the focus
from describing the exotic or curious religious "Other"
to examining scholarly practice itself, and tries to persuade
readers that prior attention to their own habits will assist
their efforts to study the habits of others. Although this
little book can be used as part of an introductory course
(when supplemented by descriptive, ethnographic materials
of the instructor’s choosing), and is accessible to interested
readers outside the university, it will also be of use in
any course in the study of religion. For, despite the topic
under study, the same intellectual skills are required to
isolate, name, and examine within a comparative context, those
collections of human artifacts that strike students as deserving
of their attention. Studying Religion: An Introduction
will therefore assist instructors across the academic study
of religion to set the table, as it were, with the descriptive
and comparative methods, as well as explanatory theories,
on which scholars routinely draw in carrying out their work.
|
| |
| |
|
|